I'm convinced the same people who considered the Sokal Squared hoax proof of intellectual rot and corruption within academia won't consider Quillette being hoaxed and embellishing the hoax themselves to be nearly as significant.https://twitter.com/jacobin/status/1159676095924510721 …
-
-
CRAniOMETrY is not pHRenOloGY
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bo, nobody cares Craniometry is not phrenology. People were making fun of the fact that you were brought these terms into your article. It is unfortunately a joke about you. If I were you, I would let it go and hope it dies in the depth of time
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When you use craniometry the way you do, it is basically phrenology
-
Like the best thing I found out about academics from twitter is how many people are openly just straight up liars
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Wonderful: craniology is not phrenology. How about now addressing the fact that you dishonestly distorted the conclusions of that craniometry paper in your Quillette review of 'Superior'? Because that was some pretty underhanded academic sleight-of-hand you pulled there.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Please provide citations for your claims. Thank you
- Show replies
-
-
-
Also, Quillette is not a peer reviewed academic publication ...
-
Neither was the penis hoax nonsense......
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
How about "Aryan"? That one doesn't have any baggage, does it?
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.