If by fix, you mean weaken them in favor of industry, well, yes. Can't wait for 2020 to undo all the havoc you corporate stooges have unleashed. Remember, its the Environmental PROTECTION Agency.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don’t recall the American public asking for cars that need filled up more often. I must have missed that chant at the last Trump rally.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wow! Guess the P In EPA really means pollution.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You put corporate profits before your mandate to protect the environment. How many deaths from lung disease and climate change will this cause?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can you explain how reducing fuel efficiency standards results in pollution reduction?
-
I believe the argument goes like this: we won't be able to afford to drive as much, thus pollution will naturally be reduced

-
Thanks for clearing that up!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So, the Trump administration is lying to Americans, & misrepresenting the facts & analysis to justify rolling back clean car standards. Ex-EPA staffer: Trump team steamrolled EPA on auto proposal. https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060091981 …pic.twitter.com/EYDqEy80a8
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
okay cool I didn't know "fix" meant "make much much worse for the warming planet that will kill us all soon" but now I do, thanks Mr. Wheeler
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Actually the fuel economy standards are uniquely crafted to save people on fuel costs no matter what size vehicle they buy, and are achievable with existing technology. Why don’t you fix something that is actually broke, like the Renewable Fuel Standards (RFS)?
-
Uniquely crafted by morons who were brainwashed from birth to tear down America so we would be weak enough for globalism to plant its flag across the entire surface of the planet perhaps. Although I agree RFS needs to be overhauled completely.
-
The problem with Biofuels for Diesel engines are not compatible with any of the EPA mandated aftertreatment systems. All over the road Diesels require ultra low sulfur fuel if not the Aftertreatment system burns out it catalyst. So either its either biofuel or emission regulation
-
How about neither?
-
Biofuels I really don't have a problem with just because you can make it yourself. I know a few who make bio diesel and I can say it's not all that environmentally friendly as people think it's just cheaper fuel.
-
I hear you though. I think another major point here you hit on though is complicating the consumption/hardware end of user market. Not worth it, but we should maybe make it an export it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
-100 MQ/ 'Ignore The Facts' 'EPA~Massively Roll Back~ Undeniably Successful Car
#GreenhouseGas#EmissionsStandards~Totally Ignoring~Technoligy & Scientific Facts~ Unprecedented~One Of The Most Anti-Science & Anti-Transparency Actions~In Agency History' Via |@TheHill | Jeff Alsonpic.twitter.com/7H9jb5JTVS
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm with her. Why aren't you? Plus trump lies daily so what are you talking about "promises"? https://twitter.com/EPAAWheeler/status/1024998800484708352 …pic.twitter.com/oruzzQ4Syw
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I will not buy a car that doesn’t meet the previously planned, higher standards. I’ll keep driving my current Chevy Cruze if carmakers don’t continue improving efficiency and emissions.
#CleanerCars I hope others join me in this pledge. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.