"Amazing what happens when political leaders at EPA enforce the Clean Air Act instead of undercutting it," David Doniger, senior strategic director of the Climate and Clean Energy program at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said in a statement.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
And now with "regulatory certainty" I'm sure we will see pollutants rise for 2018
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's also an excellent indicator that: 1) federal-level pollution regulation works, and 2) the economy does just fine when pollution is federally regulated
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A bit selective with your data presentation, no?
-
Call it out as you see it: entirely misleading and propaganda-heavy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, so STOP rolling back these regulation that will repollute our skies and air....come on....wake up people.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Now, learn from that and keep up the momentum. Systematically allowing big business to pollute because it takes too much time or money to make changes to the way they operate is inexcusable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe you should take a look at Flint Michigan, they still can't drink the water up there
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sir, can you explain how the administration's support to your buddies in the coal industry will impact atmospheric carbon emissions and, indirectly, the effect on climate change? Asking for 7,000,000,000 friends and 10,000,000 species. Eagerly anticipating your imminent reply.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So WHY then are you planning to pull back on the regulations that helped provide this success?
#CleanAirThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You're as much of an ass as pruitt. What you're saying is that with regulations in place, the poisons went down and businesses still prospered. So you decide it's better to deregulate companies so they'll prosper more while the poisons go up?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well Adminstrator Wheeler, can you now do anything about changing of the EPA's stance on CO2? CO2 is a trace gase that is responsible for plant life on earth. To declare it a danger to public welfare is not only non-scientific, it is an egregious misrepresentation of fact.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So why are you trying to stop it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Except that is wasn’t a public-private success, it was due to gift regulation over industry objections. Nice try, Pruitt lite.
-
Govt regulation
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Excuse me, Mr. Administrator, you forgot something. Carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere have skyrocketed during this period and threaten the future of the human race. Why did you conveniently ignore this deeply troubling truth?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The new rule-making proposal would gut the Clean Air Act by launching an unprecedented attack on the rights of states to
#cleanercars that protect human health.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.