Yes. This has never *not* been true. There is zero evidence that environmental policies have negative long-term impacts on job creation.
-
-
-
Also, side note: Air quality regulation generates a minimum 3 to 1 return on investment.
#airquality#StandUpForScience
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm unaware when the acronym changed to "Job Protection Agency". The environment is gone from the EPA under corrupt @EPAScottPruitt
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And pro spending 2MM a year on security for 1 person, 1MM on personal travel, and pro not anything else good for the environment.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your only responsibility is to be pro-environment, it is not to make jobs
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
There are clean jobs, not all jobs exploit the land for its resources.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
BULLSHITTERSSSSS
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
LOL you're not an economic agency YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
EPA pro-job initiative should embrace clean/renewable energy sources; coal/oil are dinosaurs like most republican legislators and Trump.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Of course can! Renewable energy creates jobs. Anyone still trying to make a living on coal needs to go extinct.
#naturalselectionThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Revoking regulations that were enacted to protect the environment from polluters is not pro-environment.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Our new report shows we don’t give a shit about the environment.”
#EPAback2basicsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This report is a political platform built of buzzwords and slogans, with no discussion of the science behind the regulations. Lamenting the 0.2% cost to economy and no acknowledgment of benefits. @EPAScottPruitt you do know you have a talented scientific staff you can consult?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
US Tax Payers funding Pruitt's security detail to the tune of over $2M per yr. First time in history!http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/article/EPA-E-P-A-Scott-pruitt-morford-security-trump-12305612.php …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.