Oh hells no. Private companies are in business to make profit. Access to clean and safe water should not be a for profit industry.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, and when no company is interested because there's no profit to be made, there's DWSRF. Stop trying to make public programs anathema.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Right. Taxpayer money to private people in the 1% is the real goal. Think we don't know that?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't trust private to protect the public. Let me point to Nestle and their stealing of public water.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why are you contributing to the gentrification of Flint! Rich America really want their land, which is why they have to pay for poisoned

-
Or get evicted. EPA is not about protecting anyone, @EPAScottPruitt is only concerned about money.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not without oversight they don't
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Eng_Sym is just 3 weeks away. register now to attend the #1 public sector energy conservation conference on May 22-25Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I can't stand Pruitt - but PPP is not a bad way to deliver infrastructure if it done well and of course corruption is left out.
-
I want what you're smoking, private always takes advantage. Old boys network is not new
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.