If anything, it accentuates their weaknesses... 

-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don’t make the rules. I just follow them
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
It’s a nice cop out for an undergraduate paper though, with the conclusion “more research needs to be done”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
True, but it also depends on how weak is being defined, right? If the studies simply lacked statistical power, then that is what meta-analyses are best suited for overcoming.
-
A fair point
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The
#Hydroxychloroquine and#Ivermectin pushers come to mind... -
Can you explain why > 200 HCQ studies, the vast majority of which are positive (32 of the last 33 in fact), or why the IVM students, 100% of which are positive, are "weak"? You keep dodging all questions about the research to back these statements.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Why does no one understand this?
-
They don't want understand. If one need "evidence" for their favorite bogus "therapy", heap of weak studies is less ridiculous than narrative review based on different types of weak evidence and big piece of omitting of counter-evidence ("scientific" Gish gallop).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
