E. Michael Jones

I listened to it and you also do a poor job of representing your position. Ad hom is not a way to dispute historical evidence. Leave that for the SPLC.

You're entitled to your opinion! But there was nothing ad hominem from my side. Not a syllable. Please be kind enough to give me one example. Thanks!

It was a reasonable debate and I found nothing to upset anyone's sensibility on your program but the continual attempt to mischaracterize Dr. Jones position which he adroitly defended. The ad hom is the attack on the listeners whom you dislike, who have just been made 'haters.'

Mitchell -- I have watched what happens when people embrace Dr. Jones' viewpoints, which is I urged him to modify his terminology and position. Just read the comments on his YT channel to our discussion. A good tree doesn't produce bad fruit.

Michael, Dr Jones has run a publication for years, called Culture Wars. There are no Nazi, or Haters, or whatever that read it. Its heavy in academic research which is rare from a Catholic perspective, unless you want to smear all Catholics as haters, or seekers of hidden truth.

EMJ's writings are a recrudescence of Judenforschung, or investigations into the depravity of the Jews. It was an academic field that was favored by the Nazis. And no, not all Catholics agree with or follow EMJ's assertions.

You never did reveal if there was someone paying you to attack Dr. Jones.

I work for the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America, a member of the conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish organizations. The link is in my bio. So, has EMJ been compensated by the Mullahs for his talks in Iran?