E. Michael Jones

Come on, Michael, 4U, it's "the Jews." "In our age, beginning around the time of the American invasion of Iraq in 2003, when the Jewish takeover of American foreign policy became too obvious to ignore, the polite goy began referring to Jews as 'Zionists,' and 'the Israel Lobby.'"

Come on Dexter, when its advantageous to be a Jew, you can't complain when its not but if course, you've got a double bind of both loving and hating defending what in essence is an apocalyptic cult.

The line of attack is easy to discern: instead of "E. Michael Jones has erred in point of fact, or I dispute his historiography," we are treated to "E. Michael Jones is an old school Jew-hater." -Only true if a Jew-hater is defined as one whom Jews hate.

EMJ describes Jews as "the group that is responsible for virtually every social ill in our day — from wars in the Middle East to pornography and gay marriage at home [...] around whose evil machinations the axis of history turns." That's old-school Jew-hatred.

And that's the very generalization I repeatedly challenged on my radio show -- and the type of generalization that has led to much Jewish bloodshed and that leads to horrifically ugly comments on his YT channel.

I listened to it and you also do a poor job of representing your position. Ad hom is not a way to dispute historical evidence. Leave that for the SPLC.

You're entitled to your opinion! But there was nothing ad hominem from my side. Not a syllable. Please be kind enough to give me one example. Thanks!

It was a reasonable debate and I found nothing to upset anyone's sensibility on your program but the continual attempt to mischaracterize Dr. Jones position which he adroitly defended. The ad hom is the attack on the listeners whom you dislike, who have just been made 'haters.'