You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
The Bloomberg situation is tough. If you’re not going to let your reporters investigate you, then they can’t investigate your rivals, but Trump is one of your rivals, which means you can’t investigate the president, which means you probably have to abandon all political coverage.
But then it gets worse, because the President’s actions touch on everything: the economy, foreign policy, trade, etc. etc., and so even non-political Bloomberg coverage is tied in some way, shape or form to Trump, who is a Bloomberg rival.
And so, while it’s not ideal, the best available option is to undo the ban on Bloomberg News investigations into Bloomberg or his Democratic rivals. Because if the case Bloomberg News is making is that it’s impartial, then it can be impartial in going about those investigations.
Divesting is a joke. It’s like Super PACs. Everyone knows who’s really running it.
Wait until Trump finds out about Fox News!
If Bloomberg News not investigating Democrats is a problem, isn’t there also a big conflict of interest allowing sitting Senators who are running against Trump to sit in judgement of him during an impeachment trial in the Senate? Shouldn’t they have to recuse themselves?
No Unlike gop, not acting illegally
There are so many unreported heartwarming local stories for Bloomberg News out there, like about cats who do silly things.
It's odd to spend so much time worrying about a candidate whose vanity candidacy is going to be over as soon as the New Hampshire polls close, even if his wealth manages to drag him along for the rest of the spring.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
