We need mandatory federal death penalty for any peace officer murdered in the line of duty. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/02/09/georgia-officer-dies-after-being-shot-while-serving-warrant-police-say.html …
But where would they find that authority in the federal Constitution? Oh. Right. They don’t follow it. Sorry.
-
-
Amen, my Brother!
@DwayneStovall , yes, he's my friend. Why? Because he gets it. He doesn't allow emotion to trump the rule of law. -
Everyone talks “Constitution” until, you know, they don’t... Even so, coming from the
@RealJamesWoods, it’s a bit disheartening. - Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
-
Try reading the document before you comment. Article VI is a limiting clause. If it isn’t “pursuant” to the limited and enumerated authorities listed, its none of the federal’s business. Good grief, read a book...
Koniec rozmowy
-
-
-
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
-
Only laws that are “pursuant” to the limited authorities listed in the Constitution. Outside of those limits, it’s none of their business. And you can quote me on that.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
-
-
-
There is process to amend COTUS, with enough support. Support neither side has right now for an issue like this
-
And they never will. This is why the States have to find the will to defy unconstitutional overreach.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
It doesn't have to be IN the Constitution. Just has to not be AGAINST the Constitution. Paying federal income tax is not in the Constitution, but it is legal. Laws don't have to be IN the Constitution, but they can't be AGAINST it. Your statement is ignorant.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.