But if course, YOU do, right? The guy who says the federal Bill of Rights does things that no SCOTUS judge ever supported until the progressive era, which is just a little late to be considered “original”. But good luck with that.
-
That's a strawman, lefty, the Bill of Rights is incumbent on states as well as federal gov't, because they lay out the rights of citizens, which should be safe against all gov't. That was the original intent, and to pretend state gov't can take those rights away is progressive.
Utter freaking nonsense. Point to a single debate in the States or in the first Congress that supports that fiction.
-
-
"The Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenthth Amendment was meant to protect the right of individuals to keep and bar arms from infringement by the states..." https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/amendments/amendment-ii …
-
This is the last time I am going to say this. NOT true according to those who authored and advocated for the 14th Amendment as FAMED Constitutional Scholar Raoul Berger has pointed out.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.