It's how we plan to continue defeating leftists at the state level attempting to infringe upon the #2A.
-
-
W odpowiedzi do to @bendynaa @PhilosophySeel i jeszcze
And how’s that progressive national approach working so far?
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 3 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @DwayneStovall @PhilosophySeel i jeszcze
I'm not a progressive, Dwayne, just a Constitutional Originalist. The states cannot infringe on the people's right to keep and bear arms, and they agreed to that themselves. Every. Last. State.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @bendynaa @PhilosophySeel i jeszcze
And you are anything but an originality. This,
@KevinGutzman, this right here. The wheels on the bus...2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 3 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @DwayneStovall @bendynaa i jeszcze
<facepalm>
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @KevinGutzman @DwayneStovall i jeszcze
Alex, you can’t be an originalist with that point of view. Think you need to study the ratifying conventions.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @LeftMale @KevinGutzman i jeszcze
You need to know what Constitutional Originalism is, and you do not: https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/white-pages/on-originalism-in-constitutional-interpretation …
3 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
But if course, YOU do, right? The guy who says the federal Bill of Rights does things that no SCOTUS judge ever supported until the progressive era, which is just a little late to be considered “original”. But good luck with that.
6 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 3 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @DwayneStovall @bendynaa i jeszcze
Alex, sorry, number 8 is wrong. The Constitution doesn’t promote democracy. The founders didn’t believe in democracy.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @LeftMale @DwayneStovall i jeszcze
Yes, Lefty, this is a Republic. Constitutional Originalism means interpreting that document and it's Amendments (which become part of the Constitution when ratified by the states) by the Original Intent of the authors, and not as a 'Living' document subject to 'judicial opinion'.
4 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony
You have nothing but modern judges rulings to support your argument & you’re so clueless about the subject you don’t even realize you’re giving your sanction to the largest most powerful central government you can get, which is the opposite of what the Constitution created.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.