He’s a good man with good values and the right ideas
-
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
-
Since the Constitution protects citizens' rights to keep and bear arms and only those powers not specifically granted to the Federal gov't are reserved to the states as states' rights, the supremacy clause can be used to negate any effort by a state to "infringe" upon that right.
So what the ratifying States requested, what the first Congress provided, and what the supreme court upheld for over 135 years, is meaningless? What you espouse is a creation of modern progressive judges & is anti-Constitution. You are supporting centralized unlimited power.
-
-
You've lost the bubble, Dwayne. The constitution protects the bill of rights, and neither the federal nor state governments can legally enact laws that violate the constitution - and I'm a states rights advocate.
-
You’re not disagreeing with me, you’re disagreeing with the men who requested a federal BoR, the 1st Congress who created the amendments, and the men who ratified them. And you’re not supporting States’ rights, you’re supporting the most powerful National Government you can get
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.