He’s a good man with good values and the right ideas
-
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
-
-
W odpowiedzi do to @Wishful_wink@LonghornMorty i jeszcze
He doesn't believe in the morally absolute Natural Rights of individuals, even though it was Stephen F. Austin's belief, as well as the beliefs of the forefathers of our Nation. He called Natural Rights philosophy "gobbledygook." In philosophical terms he's a moral relativist.pic.twitter.com/i3MVArip1m
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @PhilosophySeel@LonghornMorty i jeszcze
The term “natural rights” in our present society has been taken way out of context And I’d like to know where he said that and in what context
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @Wishful_wink@LonghornMorty i jeszcze
Natural Rights are defined by John Locke's Natural Rights philosophy, which his Social Contract theory is the architecture of our Nation. In context, he stated that States have the Right to ban guns, despite the existence of the 2nd amendment.pic.twitter.com/BTlHUc0G73
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @PhilosophySeel @Wishful_wink i jeszcze
What he failed to acknowledge is that Govts do not possess Rights because they're an unnatural entity. Only people can possess Rights. Gov'ts possess power granted by consent of the Governed for the single purpose of securing our Natural Rights.pic.twitter.com/2i89JxFi2C
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @PhilosophySeel@Wishful_wink i jeszcze
1) the U.S. is a Union of States, not a monolithic “N”ation. 2) the States requested a BoR, which includes the 2A, to restrict only the federal; a fact known to anyone who’s read the ratifying debates. 3) nothing here suggests I don’t believe in Natural Rights. You lack logic.
2 odpowiedzi 1 podany dalej 6 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @DwayneStovall@Wishful_wink i jeszcze
If you claim States have Rights, which you did, then your position is that they exist by Right, and therefore possess authority by Right over the individual's they Govern. This is an athoritarian position that fails to reason where their authority is derived from.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @PhilosophySeel @DwayneStovall i jeszcze
No Gov't possesses the Right to deprive people of their Natural and unalienable Right to defend Life, Liberty, or Property, regardless of the existence of the 2A, or States power. This fact counters your assertion that States have the Right to ban firearms.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @PhilosophySeel @DwayneStovall i jeszcze
Calling this philosophy "gobbledygook" is evidence that you do not value the Natural Rights of individuals, especially since you support the idea that Natural Rights do not apply to States.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Try reading the preamble to the federal BoR. The 1st Congress didn't mince words. You still lack logic.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.