@DanPatrick is crap and drags everyone around him down, including Abbott. We have to get rid of that guy
-
-
W odpowiedzi do to @CopeAtx@LonghornMorty i jeszcze
I’ve never been more disappointed with Texas politicians
@DwayneStovall 2020!2 odpowiedzi 1 podany dalej 17 polubionych -
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
-
W odpowiedzi do to @LonghornMorty@CopeAtx i jeszcze
He’s a good man with good values and the right ideas
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 8 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @Wishful_wink@LonghornMorty i jeszcze
He doesn't believe in the morally absolute Natural Rights of individuals, even though it was Stephen F. Austin's belief, as well as the beliefs of the forefathers of our Nation. He called Natural Rights philosophy "gobbledygook." In philosophical terms he's a moral relativist.pic.twitter.com/i3MVArip1m
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @PhilosophySeel@LonghornMorty i jeszcze
The term “natural rights” in our present society has been taken way out of context And I’d like to know where he said that and in what context
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @Wishful_wink@LonghornMorty i jeszcze
Natural Rights are defined by John Locke's Natural Rights philosophy, which his Social Contract theory is the architecture of our Nation. In context, he stated that States have the Right to ban guns, despite the existence of the 2nd amendment.pic.twitter.com/BTlHUc0G73
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @PhilosophySeel @Wishful_wink i jeszcze
What he failed to acknowledge is that Govts do not possess Rights because they're an unnatural entity. Only people can possess Rights. Gov'ts possess power granted by consent of the Governed for the single purpose of securing our Natural Rights.pic.twitter.com/2i89JxFi2C
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @PhilosophySeel@Wishful_wink i jeszcze
1) the U.S. is a Union of States, not a monolithic “N”ation. 2) the States requested a BoR, which includes the 2A, to restrict only the federal; a fact known to anyone who’s read the ratifying debates. 3) nothing here suggests I don’t believe in Natural Rights. You lack logic.
2 odpowiedzi 1 podany dalej 6 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @DwayneStovall@Wishful_wink i jeszcze
If you claim States have Rights, which you did, then your position is that they exist by Right, and therefore possess authority by Right over the individual's they Govern. This is an athoritarian position that fails to reason where their authority is derived from.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione
It's common, as Henry described in 1788, to use the term State to refer to the citizens of a State. The States are sovereign, meaning the citizens of a State hold ultimate decision making power for their State. Thinking the fed is sovereign is authoritarian. You lack logic.
-
-
W odpowiedzi do to @DwayneStovall @PhilosophySeel i jeszcze
Since the Constitution protects citizens' rights to keep and bear arms and only those powers not specifically granted to the Federal gov't are reserved to the states as states' rights, the supremacy clause can be used to negate any effort by a state to "infringe" upon that right.
3 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione - Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.