@TeamYouTube re terminations/strikes. There needs to be time for channels to respond to first strikes before more are issued. A delay of at least 24 hours between each would be good. @Frilioth had his channel terminated within hours of the first strike. /1
-
Show this thread
-
May I suggest that people also have better information - "violated Community Guidelines" is not detailed enough to enable creators to remedy a problem. Emails need to clearly state which guidelines were violated and how. /2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
it's in everyone's best interests if people feel they have been dealt with fairly & given a chance to fix things. such as 3 different assessments at least 24 hrs apart with means of requesting more time if the channel has lots of vids and progress is demonstrated /3
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Creators are all over the globe, so time between strikes allows for timezone differences. It must be awful to wake up to a suspended/terminated account when all was fine at bedtime the night before. /4
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Also, a lot of creators are not full-time, they have other jobs and responsibilities and may not be able to drop everything immediately to fix an issue or may be at work and unaware of the issue until they return home. Again, a delay of at least 24 hrs helps. /5
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread
strikes are an important tool for keeping @YouTube safe, fair, stable, but they are more effective if they are SEEN to be fair and administered with fairness. Incomplete information and too-tight timelines don't help creators or YouTube. Thank you /6
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.