Great graphic. Does this mean higher network charges in those countries?
This handy graphic from @DONGEnergyUK explains why offshore wind prices vary in UK vs DE vs DK/NL – it's about who pays for grid / cablespic.twitter.com/pYw9QA8LPT
-
-
-
Think not? Recent
@theCCCuk report said UK network charges higher than other EU & they didn't know why.https://www.carbonbrief.org/uk-energy-bills-have-fallen-since-2008-ccc … - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
And moreover NL pays for all site research and development and delivers free building license. Reports in English http://bit.ly/2qRZBoL
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Still not sure what that means? Who's paying for the grid in DK and DE?
-
The grid operator, I assume. Anyway not the developer. So the headline price is going to come out lower than in the UK.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Nice graphic,wrong headline. Cost of electricity is the same-consumer pays grid investment either via offshore subsidy or via network charge
-
Well…I guess I was referring to the prices that are reported by media / govt of $/MWh price for offshorehttps://www.government.nl/latest/news/2016/07/05/netherlands-offshore-wind-farm-borssele-cheapest-world-wide …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Not entirely sure I understand the graphic. Is it saying UK consumer pays all through network charge. Do others have tax funded part?
-
It's about how much of the grid costs are paid by the developer. All (UK) vs almost none (NL/DK).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sort of similar message on responsibilities here (from
@IEA_RETD at@AllEnergy)pic.twitter.com/siHL0x76Rv
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.