Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
In case anyone still takes @BjornLomborg seriously, apparently he really does believe that complete disintegration of the Greenland Ice Sheet (=7m of sea level rise) would cut global GDP in 2100 by a spuriously accurate 0.012% & in the year 3000 by a "rather modest" 1.2%https://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/1409839073041264640 …
The fact Lomborg cites Nordhaus in support of this claim (natch) hardly makes it more plausible FWIW, here's the Nordhaus paper, according to which each additional metre of sea level rise reduces global GDP by 1%, with damages rising linearly (??) https://www.pnas.org/content/116/25/12261 …pic.twitter.com/XCqQEiwIpE
Anyone else fancy an 80-year prediction and want to add another sig fig for good measure?
"He said, "I've been to the year 3000 Not much has changed but they lived underwater And your great, great, great granddaughter Saw lower GDP by 1.2%"
Would be nice to know costs in real things like lives, human welfare, options for the future. GDP is pretty meaningless here.
shame about places like Lowestoft and Great Yarmouth thoughhttps://www.edp24.co.uk/news/maps-show-sea-level-rise-impact-on-norfolk-and-suffolk-1502350 …
https://twitter.com/mikegalsworthy/status/1134778322695720960?s=19 … I think it's time to wheel this out again
actual lolz, I had forgotten that one
You fools, he's right! GDP will be fine! So much destruction to rebuild, bodies to burry, new diseases to sell medicine for, weapons to manufacture, new problems to solve! GDP go brrrrr.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
