Dr. Robert Epstein

@DrREpstein

Author of 15 books, researcher at AIBRT, loving of five, former editor-in-chief . To support my research:

California
Joined May 2014

Tweets

You blocked @DrREpstein

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @DrREpstein

  1. Pinned Tweet
    Aug 19

    ., whom I have strongly supported for many years, told blatant lies about me today. As a result, I have been subjected to widespread condemnation by mainstream media. I'm going to fight this. Stay tuned tomorrow for my first-ever twitter storm.

    Undo
  2. And lots of you keep warning me that my life is in danger. I sure hope that isn't true. Anyway, I was already killed by a Street View vehicle back in 2014! See:

    Undo
  3. People are telling me I need to connect the 18 tweets in my vs. Twitter storm into a "thread." I'll try to figure that out tomorrow. Thanks, everyone, for your encouragement and kind words.

    Undo
  4. Finally, : I have always admired you as a self-sacrificing person who is trying to improve people's lives, and I have tried to emulate you in these ways - as best I can. I also know you've sometimes been punished for your good deeds. I can relate. With admiration, /re

    Undo
  5. : If I haven't yet convinced you that the tweet you sent about me yesterday was unjustified & deeply flawed, please read these recent comments on my work by . He might be a lowly , but he still kicks butt.

    Undo
  6. : Among other tools, they can use "ephemeral experiences"-a term from a email that leaked to in 2018-to shift votes without leaving a paper trail. Ephemeral experiences like those search results I found that were biased in your favor.

    Undo
  7. : If Big Tech cos. support the same candidate in 2020, they can shift 15M votes her way without people knowing how the shift occurred. If you had a choice between preserving & putting your candidate in office, which would you choose?

    Undo
  8. : Is that what you want your legacy to be? Whistleblowers & leaks from have confirmed that the company blacklists, re-ranks & uses "ephemeral experiences" (which I study) to control people worldwide. Do you approve?

    Undo
  9. : poses 3 serious threats to humanity: 1) an obscene level of across 200+ platforms, 2) the power to determine what content 2+ billion can or can NOT see () () & 3) invisible on a massive scale.

    Undo
  10. : If you examine my work carefully, you will find that it adheres to the very highest standards of scientific integrity. You will also conclude, I believe, that poses a serious threat to the free-&-fair election & to human autonomy. See

    Undo
  11. : I know you're in 's pocket, but for the sake of our , I urge you listen to my recent Congressional testimony () & to scan the 58 essays & conference papers I list at the end of my written testimony:

    Undo
  12. : If my work has been "debunked," why was it included in a volume just published by U.? Why have I been invited to speak about it at prestigious venues worldwide: U., Law School (where both you & Bill went), even our (where you served)?

    Undo
  13. About 96% of 2016 campaign donations from employees went to . And , Hillary's Chief Analytics Officer, credits his 2012 tech team, informally supervised by , for half of Obama's win margin: nearly 2.5 million votes.

    Undo
  14. A leaked email showed that in 2014 's offered to run 's tech campaign (see pic). In 2015, Schmidt in fact funded The Groundwork, a highly secretive tech company, the sole purpose of which was to put Clinton into office.

    Undo
  15. has long depended on for both money & votes. Her largest donor in 2016 was Alphabet/Google. Her Chief Technology Officer during the campaign was Stephanie Hannon, a former Google exec. And then there's , longtime head of Google - the guy in the pic:

    Undo
  16. Now, switching to .: This is going to hurt me to write, because I & my whole extended family have been strong supporters of the Clintons for decades. I have a framed, signed letter from on the wall near my desk. But should be ashamed of herself.

    Undo
  17. If you want the full story about my 2016 election monitoring project, read my essay, "Taming Big Tech: The Case for Monitoring," published last year:

    Undo
  18. tweet, point #3: It doesn't matter whether the bias in search results was deliberate or not. Once it appeared - which it did at least 6 months before the election - it began shifting opinions & votes without people's knowledge & without leaving a paper trail.

    Undo
  19. tweet, point #2: The level of pro- bias I found in 's search results - absent on & - was enough to convince between 2.6 & 10.4 million undecided voters to vote for Hillary. . said 16 million; that's wrong.

    Undo
  20. tweet, point #1: I've never said that deliberately "manipulated" the 2016 election, but I measured substantial pro- bias in 's search results by preserving & analyzing 13,207 election-related searches & the 98,044 web pages linked to those searches.

    Undo
  21. Tweet storm starting now - getting interrupted from time to time by calls from reporters... I've been caught in the middle of an exchange of tweets between 2 media titans, & . 's tweet was slightly wrong. 's tweet was shameful.

    Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·