Just wondering what @YouTube's policy on images of children's genitals for educational purposes is... Some creative editing may be required #HealthcareAndSecularism
It’s not “half of the genitals,” and it’s not “half the skin of the penis.” If you are against circumcision, fine, however you should know your data.
-
-
Whatever amount of skin is lost, it has a purpose and that is to protect the glans. It should also be noted we are not talking about just skin, we are talking about losing a significant number of nerves that are central to a pleasurable sexual experience.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pat, for me it was about half the skin on my shaft, around 45% to be exact, and I also had my entire frenulum shaved off. I was given a style called “high and tight” with a Gomco clamp.
-
I think that's what's normal, but people try to minimize the damage, to rationalize it. For those of you in the US, 4mm is less than a quarter of an inch, about 1/6th actually, it's 0.16 inches. That's how little she's claiming is cut off. Does that picture look like 1/6"?
-
Reyos, we both know she is clueless on this topic and the reality of the harm. Her vile attitude and utter lack of empathy don’t help either. This is your classic baby boomer doc.
-
Here is what her patients have to say -pic.twitter.com/kQLOJDXAin
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
False. You should know your data. Please read: http://www.noharmm.org/snip.htm
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.