-
-
- Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Agree
@DrOniBee! A bit like “hard to reach” which takes no account of the fact that we might be hard to reach and puts the onus on the patient to come to and not us to them..... -
Yes! I’ve heard otherts use the more accurate term “hardly reached”.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
True, but when you have multiple co-morbidities, you are in fact a medically complex person.
-
I disagree. Someone with several medical conditions is not uncommon & they need coordinated care. Navigating the health care system (in the U.S.) is what is complex, & it's often left to the patient to coordinate that care bc specialists rarely confer with one another directly.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Tweet je nedostupan.
- Kraj razgovora
-
-
-
I hear you and agree with you broadly - but I would also ask: does the book get into clinical care of the multi-morbid? We see a lot of folks challenged in the community to manage CHF, DM2, CKD, mood disorders all at once, and lots of gaps emerge (which is what we work to fix!)..
-
Based on the course description it does, but if the system were better designed to manage and coordinate the care of people with mult-comorbidities, if health care delivery system etc. weren’t so siloed, patients wouldn’t be labeled “medically complex.”
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
student • HIV x sexual health x racial & gender equity • views=mine
B/c the issue shouldn’t be w/ the patients, it should be w/ our health care system which is “ill-designed” to care for & coordinate care for pts w/ mult. co-morbidies who face mult. structural barriers to care.
