I’ve listened to the first 15 mins of ur presentation. I strongly disagree with ur foundational premise that issue of circumcision is void of a ethnic component. Clearly it’s Jewish-Gentile dynamics that’s at the center of the controversy in this text. If u choose 2 deny this ...https://twitter.com/DrOakley1689/status/1056353508352376832 …
-
-
Regardless if it was a covenant marker Dr.O, Peter stopped eating with the Gentiles. Why? Not because he didn’t think they couldn’t be saved! He knew they could FROM ACTS. He gave Cornelius the Gospel. He was afraid of the backlash of those who still thought Gentiles were dirty
-
And NOT saved because of uncircumcision. This is SHOWING partiality. Peter showing partiality to the Judiazers tomfoolery, was what led people to think you must include all the junk and Christ to become justified. Why is THIS SO HARD?!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.