Please find the data of our study below. Happy to answer questions, but working on several projects regarding the outbreak, please excuse any delays. Important: we experimentally generated aerosols and kept them afloat in a drum. This is not evidence of aerosol transmission.https://twitter.com/medrxivpreprint/status/1237674436028960768 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
I am hoping you can help me answer two questions I've had on my mind. Thank you so much for fighting for us. Is there a way to model the spread in ambient air currents as opposed to the drum method? Can the virus adhere to particulates like dust, and be stirred up by movement?
-
I can't find the link but a bbc China article I read indicated that that was the case.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bravo and thanks for that clarification. Stay strong. Best wishes from Switzerland.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I think it’s encouraging all air samples here were negative. And it underlines the need to disinfect surfaces.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Could you clarify? "Half-life"
#s in the paper appear to be half-life of titer, which is a log scale, not linear. So this "half-life" appears to be different from, for example, radioactivity or pharmacokinetics "half-life". Is that correct? -
Titer is plotted on a log scale in our paper, but it is a measurement that should, in principle, be proportional to the number of virions (virus particles) in a sample. As Fig 2 shows, it decays approx. exponentially over time. Est. half-lives come from these est. decay rates
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.