Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I don't have statistics to back this up, but my sense is that Classics as a field is probably around 40% philology, 35% archaeology and maybe 15% ancient history (with the rest epigraphy, paleography, papyrology, etc.)? Just going from conferences, etc.
It is hard to say. It does seem that of the popular magazine publications (Ancient Warfare, Ancient World etc., focus on history. Archaeology certainly has its own appeal, although usually more broadly: Archaeology Magazine and Nat. Geo. which both often/
feature ancient stuff. Still, its telling that the AIA has a very successful public outreach venue in Archaeology, while the SCS's attempt to do the same, Amphora, was an embarrassing failure. Eidolon, also defunct, might have served as an outlet/
for Classics at large, but quickly turned into navel gazing for people already in the field. You do find some "high brow" out reach, say Daniel Mendelsohn in the New Yorker, but the market for Classical lit. is certainly narrower.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
