19/33 A recent study found 64% of men circumcised as neonates had a negative view of it. But given that it’s irreversible, that there are valid, meritorious reasons why any man would object to it, & that the overwhelming majority of intact men will NEVER need nor want one…
Attacks are not conversation. I never said body integrity wasn’t a right and do not perform or recommend circumcisions and yet you attacked me because their is a ‘dr’ in front of my name. No matter your side, female genital mutilation is not IN ANY WAY comparable to circumcision.
-
-
Do boys have the right to keep the healthy bodies they're born with, or is that right enjoyed only by girls? I'm also confident nothing on this thread could reasonably read as an attack. Severing part of a penis in the absence of disease, diagnosis or consent - that's an attack.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm sorry you feel attacked. I'm confident that if anyone attacked you it was not me. See my full correspondence to you here https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets&q=from%3Aintactbydefault%20%40DrLovlie&src=typd …
#i2 -
Regarding your insistence and genital cutting is completely different based on sex, I urge you to read this article because you are making some incorrect presumptions http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2014/02/female-genital-mutilation-and-male-circumcision-time-to-confront-the-double-standard/ …
#i2 -
Thanks again for being willing to have a discussion. I hope we can do so without anyone feeling personally attacked.
#i2
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.