We definitely need more confirmation of PH3. But uh... this ain't it, folks.https://twitter.com/DrFunkySpoon/status/1310893866342592518 …
-
-
-
Replying to @arejaygraham
The signals that they are trying to separate are very small and very close together. And if it *is* in this spectrum I would want to see it at more than just one altitude. Make absolutely sure it's not noise.
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @RadPlanets @arejaygraham
They're not wrong in saying that the data could support the presence of PH3. But they certainly didn't unambiguously detect it, either.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @RadPlanets
Gotcha. Yeah there is room for self-deception on this kind of stuff. Comforting to know that many teams are likely frantically working on various independent confirmation methods
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @arejaygraham
Yeah definitely! It's exciting to see so much Venus work being done!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Interesting to see some folks have made up their minds that it absolutely is not there. Which is just as silly as being certain it is there at this point… Looking for it in archival data is a good move, but if it were a clear signal it likely would have been published before...
-
-
Replying to @DrFunkySpoon @arejaygraham
Nothing is ever certain when it comes to Venus
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.





