2) Anyone can read the FDA warning press release themselves.https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-informs-public-about-possible-accuracy-concerns-with-abbott-id-now-point-of-care-test-301059882.html …
-
-
Show this thread
-
3) there are discussions out there that the validation study with the high false negative could be flawed — and thus machine could still be better than reported. Let’s see what the re-analysis is.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Once again you don’t tell the entire story. Accuracy is impacted by the handling of the sample. That is true of every sample is it not? Stop being so partisan. That’s not science.
-
Additionally it is based on a study that has yet to be peer reviewed. If it goes through peer review and the results hold and the methodology and efficacy of the results can be replicated then I’ll eat my words. You won’t.
#PartisanScience
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
3/3
Trump recommendations.
1. #HydroxychloroquineAndAzithromycin 2. Abbott 3. Bleach injection -
4 - “ without coronavirus testing, we would have very few cases”.pic.twitter.com/ZWc8S9TwdW
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Isn't the FN rate for the regular/slower PCR tests around 30% ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Shhhh maybe he'll get it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
50/50 are super shitty odds .
-
In MLB bat .500 you're in the hall of fame. 50/50 ain't bad odds, but you can't count on luck with the wuflu
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.