3) Thus, we need to know to what extent Case1 may have infected others besides Case2 in WA, given that Case2’s infected descended from Case1 genetically, but neither knew w/ each other. Researchers currently say “Our best current expectation is a few hundred current infections”
-
-
Diesen Thread anzeigen
Ende der Unterhaltung
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
2) Rewind -here was WA case1’s coronavirus test history (report from
@NEJM), which showed Case1 had positive tests via nasal swabs, but had contradictory oral swab/other results. Notice Case 1’s oral test was negative on day 12 despite positive nasal. Shows maybe unstable test.pic.twitter.com/CDVPtfXrpJ
Diesen Thread anzeigen -
3) (repost) we need to know what extent Case1 may have infected others besides Case2 in WA, given that Case2’s infected descended from Case1 genetically, but neither knew w/ each other. Researchers currently say “Our best current expectation is a few hundred current infections”
Diesen Thread anzeigen - 1 weitere Antwort
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
Okay, so they are related. #2 visited #1 and got infected. I'm relived we've tracked to patient #1 in the trasmission. That's good news and you can't assume the transmission date as #2 may have been visiting for a while.
-
I think it means #1 gave it to an unknown and it kept being transmitted to unknowns until it got to #2. Hence the assumption that it's been around for 6-weeks and a couple hundred people have been infected.
- 5 weitere Antworten
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
One of the cruise ship passengers left quarantine and was on their news there locally. Check out their local news, they've been reporting about it for over a month. He was "cleared" by the trump admin controlled cdc workers. It's why I've been ripping my hair out yelling on here
-
But that has nothing to do with this case. It's a separate other problem, but this virus is here whether we like it or not
- 1 weitere Antwort
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
Doesn’t that also mean the incubation period is greater than 14 days?
-
No, that doesn't follow. I think you're assuming Case 2 got it from Case 1. That is not what is being presented. Case 2 has a variant that is descendant from the variant in Case 1, which means it most likely spread through intermediate hosts.
- 1 weitere Antwort
Neue Unterhaltung -
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.
whistleblower / Active