You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
9. BOTTOMLINE: 1) Seafood market not the source. 2) This RNA #coronavirus mutates really fast. 3) 
has unusual middle segment never seen before in any coronavirus. 4) Not from recent mixing. 5) That mystery middle segment encodes protein responsible for entry into host cells.
10. TO BE CLEAR: I am absolutely not saying it’s bioengineering, nor am I supporting any conspiracy theories with no evidence. I’m simply saying scientists need to do more research + get more data. And finding the origin of the virus is an important research priority. Goodnight
pic.twitter.com/N4Yp2H8Tst
11. Dubbing this the [GENETIC THREAD] thread, let’s delve back into the genetic similarities of the new 
with SARS and bat #coronaviruses. Study in Lancet says ~88% related to closest bat coronavirus, 79% to SARS (which is more than humans-elephants) https://marlin-prod.literatumonline.com/pb-assets/Lancet/pdfs/S0140673620302518.pdf …pic.twitter.com/2568DtbsoJ
12. ...As you can see, the new nCOV is a branch off the bat coronavirus subgenus. It is too distant from SARS (79%) or MERS (only 50% related)pic.twitter.com/A3nxtwt7Jh
13. For the most part, the new #coronavirus shares 87-88% overlap with bat coronavirus. But there are parts of it like the “S” gene region where I drops to ~70%, and even 68% in lowest point. But other gene regions share consensus as high as 95%.pic.twitter.com/XrIQOfgSOQ
14. What is in the “S” region of the #coronavirus? According to the Lancet piece (link 
above), it encodes the virus envelop spike protein of the for binding receptors of host cells - “crucial for host tropism” — which basically identifies how to target 
host tissue.pic.twitter.com/rtqjDrtRgw
15. One source or many sources? The mutation rate suggests the 2019-nCoV came from just one recent source in single jump (as opposed to several mutation sources). This doesn’t mean much other than it wasn’t several strains that started outbreak. Don’t over-interpret. Just FYI.pic.twitter.com/utEN7O4krg
You need to be careful.
Yea the authors of the paper are legit.
This is from the 2016 paper out of UNC where they bio-engineered another bat coronavirus and made it incredibly virulentpic.twitter.com/vi69qHIotM
But how could they know the effect upon humans without it being tested on humans? There is only one place in the world where this could happen.. As discussed here..
https://youtu.be/tX859E6hAN4?t=524 …
#coronavirus
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
” is often heard, but it’s trickier. The 
