Public health scientist
/ Epidemiologist / Health Economist / Harvard ‘07 + Johns Hopkins ‘04 / Taught 15yrs HarvardSPH / NYT-feat. pharma whistleblower
U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
8. Continuing: “Our study rejects the hypothesis of emergence as a result of a recent recombination event.”—> I.e. the authors also conclude that the new #coronavirus did not originate from random recent admixture between different coronaviruses. Other possibilities of course.
9. BOTTOMLINE: 1) Seafood market not the source. 2) This RNA #coronavirus mutates really fast. 3) 
has unusual middle segment never seen before in any coronavirus. 4) Not from recent mixing. 5) That mystery middle segment encodes protein responsible for entry into host cells.
10. TO BE CLEAR: I am absolutely not saying it’s bioengineering, nor am I supporting any conspiracy theories with no evidence. I’m simply saying scientists need to do more research + get more data. And finding the origin of the virus is an important research priority. Goodnight
pic.twitter.com/N4Yp2H8Tst
11. Dubbing this the [GENETIC THREAD] thread, let’s delve back into the genetic similarities of the new 
with SARS and bat #coronaviruses. Study in Lancet says ~88% related to closest bat coronavirus, 79% to SARS (which is more than humans-elephants) https://marlin-prod.literatumonline.com/pb-assets/Lancet/pdfs/S0140673620302518.pdf …pic.twitter.com/2568DtbsoJ
12. ...As you can see, the new nCOV is a branch off the bat coronavirus subgenus. It is too distant from SARS (79%) or MERS (only 50% related)pic.twitter.com/A3nxtwt7Jh
13. For the most part, the new #coronavirus shares 87-88% overlap with bat coronavirus. But there are parts of it like the “S” gene region where I drops to ~70%, and even 68% in lowest point. But other gene regions share consensus as high as 95%.pic.twitter.com/XrIQOfgSOQ
14. What is in the “S” region of the #coronavirus? According to the Lancet piece (link 
above), it encodes the virus envelop spike protein of the for binding receptors of host cells - “crucial for host tropism” — which basically identifies how to target 
host tissue.pic.twitter.com/rtqjDrtRgw
15. One source or many sources? The mutation rate suggests the 2019-nCoV came from just one recent source in single jump (as opposed to several mutation sources). This doesn’t mean much other than it wasn’t several strains that started outbreak. Don’t over-interpret. Just FYI.pic.twitter.com/utEN7O4krg
Have you looked at the kind of person you're inspiring below?
Please don't discourage him. I value any information I can get, and evaluate it all. Eric's thread is actually a great antidote to some of the wilder stuff I have seen out there. Just because some people (who would do it anyway) go off on a tangent, don't punish the rest of us.
It was an lab that created this. Someone posted the actual documents they found under an file name and even mentions #Wuhan in the document and the Seafood market too. I'm not an conspiracy theorist but the dots now are coming more together and showing an pattern here!!!
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
” is often heard, but it’s trickier. The 
