24) It has been my experience at work that private citizens generally use their best English writing skills in communicating to Congress. Dr. Ford has a Stanford pedigree, is a PhD, and is heavily published. The letter is sloppy.
-
-
35) This person has been published in countless peer-reviewed journals. Doesn’t add up.
Show this thread -
36) Another example: The letter writer refers to the same bathroom twice, but the second mention makes it sound like it is a totally different bathroom.pic.twitter.com/Uqva0uwjls
Show this thread -
37) If she is married and published under her married name why is she using her maiden name?pic.twitter.com/FVOQqrqRyt
Show this thread -
38) Why doesn’t she refer to herself as “Dr.?” Where is her return address? Where is Feinstein’s address? Eshoo’s?pic.twitter.com/3fwyYctT1c
Show this thread -
39) The word “confidential” appears three times, once in bold. Where did Ford agree to have her name released again?pic.twitter.com/gfDgEPUu6J
Show this thread -
40) Shift in tense here: “It is upsetting” (present tense) but “I felt” (past tense). Again not PhD level writing or even basic business writing.pic.twitter.com/6t2V2nVU8f
Show this thread -
41) Where is the Privacy Release Form that would allow Feinstein to inquire on Ford’s behalf?
Show this thread -
-
43) Why did Ricki Seidman, a loyal Clinton and Obama operative, say. 20 days before the letter was written, “I expect a strategy will emerge” to counter Kavanaugh?https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/21/ricki-seidman-strategy-defeat-kavanaugh/ …
Show this thread -
44) Timeline: July 6, “I notified my local representative.” July 10, Seidman does interview predicting “strategy.” July 30–letter. Was it snail mailed or emailed? Faxed?
Show this thread -
45) This whole story just doesn’t add up. Starting with that very fake-sounding letter.
Show this thread -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.