BKA: Acknowledging the process of destruction that is part of your work, even your organizing of the texts, is an alteration, a change. This is a way to keep the focus on the multiple levels of people, places, materials involved in the archive. 13/
-
-
UC: digitization democratizes and yet it also can preserve hierarchies of power and access. 24/
Näytä tämä ketju -
UC: how do we contend with verifiability that forecloses certain kinds of inquiry. How we think through this problem of authenticity or facticity of data? We can think about how the archive is a political project. Again citing Habib's work. 25/
Näytä tämä ketju -
UC: we need to drill down into our assumptions of the authenticity of collections. We should also think of the accidents in the archive in terms of collections or oversights. 26/
Näytä tämä ketju -
BKA: if a decolonized archive is possible it must be done in concert with the communities that are colonized. An honest and collaborative conversation and action. We make this a democratic space for the public, not just famous scholars. 27/
Näytä tämä ketju -
UC: we need to think about the settler frameworks in which we are all implicated if we are to truly going to have decolonization beyond just metaphor and additive "diversity," model of adding one or two more scholars in the collection. 28/
Näytä tämä ketju -
BKA & UC: we must do whatever we can to demystify the process and to acknowledge the norms that are present that can exclude so that we can insure communal belonging. 29/29pic.twitter.com/niDMfd0Xbu
Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.