What happens if you are a minority scholar whose work doesn’t center questions of race and identity? Is all academic programming obligated to center such questions? I seriously disagree with the idea that litigating conference programming via tweet builds a more just academy. https://twitter.com/DrDadabhoy/status/1304978016640970752 …
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.Näytä tämä ketju
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @AsheeshKSi
No one is doing that. So please don’t twist what happened. Minoritized scholars are under no obligation to work in race, a point I’ve made several places and this conference is about enslavement, so it is about race.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 5 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @DrDadabhoy
I’m not twisting what’s happening at all. You’ve litigated a conference program via tweet, based on highly arbitrary categories of diversity & inclusion. You deal in absolutes, not contingencies. The academy & the field is worse off as a result.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @AsheeshKSi ja @DrDadabhoy
I didn't find the categories of Dr. Dadabhoy's critique to be at all arbitrary. I think her tweet made clear that she was precisely not asking for inclusion in an existing program but pointing out the way the fundamental frames of the conference decentered BIPOC perspectives.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @lerikscline ja @DrDadabhoy
She quite literally accused the Huntington of not supporting BIPOC scholars. That’s fundamentally incorrect. Many BIPOC scholars have been supported by them. & I simply disagree that bc this conference program didn’t happen to have some, it means it’s flawed.pic.twitter.com/EYC2MiJLMH
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @AsheeshKSi ja @DrDadabhoy
To interpret that tweet as meaning "the Huntington has never supported a BIPOC scholar" would be reading well out of context. Insofar as conference presentations support our work, the programers of this conference did not seek opportunities to support BIPOC scholars at the event.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 5 tykkäystä -
You might disagree about the importance of feature BIPOC scholars and perspectives at a conference about colonialism and slavery. But I think you're mischaracterizing Dr. Dadabhoy's points by claiming she issued an absolutist and arbitrary critique.
3 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @lerikscline ja @DrDadabhoy
I disagree with you; and given that she’s slandered me with the lie that I’m “caping for white supremacy,” I think we’ve arrived at the ad hominem conversation stopper where I’m not going to waste my time engaging further with her or her defenders.pic.twitter.com/fuck5VI0UL
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @AsheeshKSi ja @DrDadabhoy
Feel very free to disengage, but I will just point out that Dr. Dadabhoy doesn't reference any name or handle in that tweet, whereas you have been consistently quotetweeting and screenshotting her feed. You accused her of making academia worse, and on that, indeed, I can't agree.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystä
It’s so curious that the Huntington is an innocent victim of my Twitter following.... they have no power or agency. It’s all me, untenured, jr faculty who actually needs to use that institution for my own work. 
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.