What happens if you are a minority scholar whose work doesn’t center questions of race and identity? Is all academic programming obligated to center such questions? I seriously disagree with the idea that litigating conference programming via tweet builds a more just academy. https://twitter.com/DrDadabhoy/status/1304978016640970752 …
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.Näytä tämä ketju
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @AsheeshKSi
No one is doing that. So please don’t twist what happened. Minoritized scholars are under no obligation to work in race, a point I’ve made several places and this conference is about enslavement, so it is about race.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 5 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @DrDadabhoy
I’m not twisting what’s happening at all. You’ve litigated a conference program via tweet, based on highly arbitrary categories of diversity & inclusion. You deal in absolutes, not contingencies. The academy & the field is worse off as a result.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @AsheeshKSi
Please point me to the power I have over conference programming. I actually spent some time reviewing the program and the participants and pointed out a serious occlusion based on the institution’s mission. If you have a problem with them cancelling, take it up with them.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 3 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @DrDadabhoy
Well, the program was cancelled & by admission of the Huntington this was in direct response to your concerns. More generally, we obviously have very different ideas of how to build a better academy and specifically how conference programming should be operating!
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
Imagine people having different ideas and opinions? I thought that’s what academic discourse and rigor was all about.... 
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.