The take may not be wrong—it's what I did—but it makes me sad. The world benefits from scholars of lit, history, & culture who don't root their methods in computation & problematize the act of doing so. Artistic & humanistic work deserves more funding & less tech solutionism.https://twitter.com/Ted_Underwood/status/1296462018891984896 …
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @XandaSchofield
I tho k the tweet is bad. It delegitimizes graduate work in the humanities. Suggests that our modes of inquiry don’t require specialized study. They they are adjunct to other fields.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 3 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @DrDadabhoy
Agree -- and sorry for any ambiguity otherwise! My taking this route wasn't to say "I will still be a trained humanities scholar this way" so much as "I can have a faculty job and spend a bit of it doing something related to hum. scholarship I want to learn more about." 1/2
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä
I got your meaning. I think the op was wrong in thinking that market forces are inevitable in terms of value. This is not education. This is also a very privileged statement but it’s also true. Technical training will not lead to justice or a better society.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.