do you make the time to respond and expend both energy and emotional reserves to do so; 4) white colleagues can chose to skip over these posts at no cost to themselves, it's not really about them after all; 5) you don't respond, but you are now aware of rampant racism 2/
-
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
in your community as you see other scholars also letting the claims sit unchallenged or moderators removing discussion because the tone of respondents rather than the actual racist comment has been upsetting for the normative whiteness of the community; 6/
Näytä tämä ketju -
6) You do respond and now you have to field listserv replies for hours rather than doing your own work; 7) the distraction of racism eats your time, focus, and energy; 8) you're now identified as a "trouble-maker," or loud, or angry in your field; 7/
Näytä tämä ketju -
9) Other people on the list are now uncomfortable because we've moved off topic so they keep ignoring the issue and move on to new "related" topic; 10) racism wins because you can't keep fighting by yourself while the majority remains silent. 8/8
#AcademicTwitter#LitPOCNäytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.