Bad hot take here, bro. It’s not just unpopular, it lacks nuance. People who don’t have kids still have care obligations. Care is gendered. People w/o kids might not be able to have them, which is not without its own stress & can inhibit “productivity.” https://t.co/BBdSpNr1Sd
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @DrDadabhoy ja @Diane_Watt
I'm seething. Scrolled through and read his defenses too; at one point he says that academics with children can't successfully teach students during this time. Um, buddy, I've seen several academic parents - in my own dept and on here - who are doing a stellar job.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 12 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @salu1292 ja @Diane_Watt
Wyte male privilege in action. Must be nice to victimize yourself.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 7 tykkäystä -
This is the same person who likely wouldn’t think about the obstacles that scholars who are BIPOC and/or women face during non-pandemic times. :/
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 7 tykkäystä -
Without a doubt
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystä -
His sense of self entitlement is staggering.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
His kind of thinking is why those of us about to come on the job market are still warned to take off wedding rings and never mention our children. Because we clearly can’t be productive and contribute to a department if we have families

2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 3 tykkäystä
Absolutely. And I bet he thinks of himself as a woke. 
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.