There is a distinct lack of rigor in these texts, an ambivalent acceptance of white constructions of identity as though that in itself is a neutral project. These texts are written by esteemed scholars in the field and they are retrograde in their understandings of race 2/
-
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
as an epistemological category. Even as they are dubious about race in the early modern period, they write about it with so much authority from their uncritical and uninterrogated racial position. This can no longer be an acceptable methodology. 3/3
#IAmWritingNäytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
My ungenerous take about some of that is that they’ve read her work, but they don’t like the conclusions, so they keep raising issues that were settled already as if they’re open questions. They don’t like that she won that argument, so they’re pretending it’s ongoing.
-
At this point this is the only take we can have.pic.twitter.com/r4h0e8aZPl
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Mind boggling!!!
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.