Some reflections on #MLA2020 and conference practices: 1. When designing a panel diversity should be a guiding principle. This means that you think of the identity categories of your speakers as well as other invisible markers of diversity like ability and 1/
-
-
Moderators, don’t be afraid to cut off long-winded questioners when you know there are lots of hands up in the room. Also think of the identity categories of the people you’re calling upon first. Let’s embed diversity into all of our practices. 6/
Näytä tämä ketju -
Senior scholars showing up to support junior scholars is so important. I loved seeing them in the audience and asking questions during the q&a. They modeled academic generosity. Let’s have more of this! 7/
Näytä tämä ketju -
The panel session is an opportunity to experiments offering comments that will support the work should be the primary goal of the q&a. But also be critical of presentations that might be reproducing damaging hierarchies. 8/
Näytä tämä ketju -
Don’t badge check. People are important not their affiliations. If we are committed to justice and diversity then fetishizing affiliations is simply reproducing exclusion. 9/
Näytä tämä ketju -
Make access and inclusion central commitments to how you present your work. It’s the only way we will build a sustainable and humane profession.
#MLA2020Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.