I was on the roundtable plenary for the #Afterlives conference hosted by the Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies @CSULB. During Q&A we were asked whether we can think about race or whiteness in the premodern in the way they seem to have been 1/
-
-
Lots of food for thought! I need to get my head around it! I worry that when race is discussed in contemporary fields, it is removed from history l!
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I worry that popular conservative uses of race and the uses Ambereen notes via that question rely on a narrow idea of “race” as necessarily involving rigid taxonomy /fixed meaning. They both do the same work of dismissing a broad swath of racial meanings then & now.
-
This is exactly the whole, "I have never researched critical race" and thus "I am living in pre-WWII" and showing my clueless, bad researcher self for public consumption. They also show their incredible white mediocrity b/c their bad researcher selves think they have authority.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
SIGH. All I can say is folks are not reading the last 60 years of critical race theory. That "ethnicity" thing is so neoconservative BS. Also, groups go in and out of racialization folks. Oh the spectacle of authority when they have not done the critical research.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.