I was on the roundtable plenary for the #Afterlives conference hosted by the Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies @CSULB. During Q&A we were asked whether we can think about race or whiteness in the premodern in the way they seem to have been 1/
-
-
seeks to undermine our work. Again, it is a demand of proof that is unwilling to read what is right there in front of them in the use of the word Black. I'm not suggesting that there's only one fixed meaning of Black, but I am suggesting that this meaning 8/
Näytä tämä ketju -
is important and should not be ignored. If we refuse to see how difference is articulated through race in our periods and to read race as capacious and inconsistent, then we will continue to reproduce racial (white) formations of the past, while denying them. 9/
Näytä tämä ketju -
I don't think the person who asked us that question was being insincere in his inquiry. But I am suspicious of claims that use the promiscuous circulation and application of Black to Euro identities as evidence of an unraced premodern period. 10/ 10
#ShakeRaceNäytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.