reified or fixed in our own moment, particularly the seemingly monolithic category of white/whiteness. The example proposed was that ethnic differences seemed more relevant, such as the construction of those living in the Basque region as "black." 2/
-
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
I'm satisfied with the answer I gave, which is that whiteness is being constructed and made specific and particular in these moments. I also pointed out how utilizing terms like "Ethiope" in Shakespeare always has a racial register, even if we reduce it to 3/
Näytä tämä ketju -
only meaning "sunburnt." It contains within in it different geographical registers of difference, cultural ones, and somatic ones. Moreover, the contrast actively instantiates whiteness. What I didn't have the chance to point out, is that even if we are 4/
Näytä tämä ketju -
talking about ethnic differences, we need to think about what the descriptor black is doing in the example of Basque invoked by my interlocutor. Even here, I think Black is doing race work. What is the point of conjuring Black as a marker of difference? 5/
Näytä tämä ketju -
These are moments of racial thinking. This is how race gets made. This is also how our work gets unmade, because this question points out the inconsistency of what we are saying, which then means that it can't be legitimate. It demands consistency of racial 6/
Näytä tämä ketju -
discourses or it demands that race doesn't exist. Race, however, as has been shown by so many of our early modern CRT scholars is not consistent now and was not then. The demand of consistency like that of historicizing, by the dominant group 7/
Näytä tämä ketju -
seeks to undermine our work. Again, it is a demand of proof that is unwilling to read what is right there in front of them in the use of the word Black. I'm not suggesting that there's only one fixed meaning of Black, but I am suggesting that this meaning 8/
Näytä tämä ketju -
is important and should not be ignored. If we refuse to see how difference is articulated through race in our periods and to read race as capacious and inconsistent, then we will continue to reproduce racial (white) formations of the past, while denying them. 9/
Näytä tämä ketju -
I don't think the person who asked us that question was being insincere in his inquiry. But I am suspicious of claims that use the promiscuous circulation and application of Black to Euro identities as evidence of an unraced premodern period. 10/ 10
#ShakeRaceNäytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
the little thread emoji is so cute! Love that! (ok, I'll read the actual thread now).
- Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
I was on the roundtable plenary for the