They can’t explain why because they don’t know their CRT or Post/anti/decolonial theory... so it is just we will complain about senior WOC scholar in our field (can count how many there are of those on my hand) but not do our research b/c white mediocrity.
-
-
Like how do you say you disagree w/ Heng’s definition w/out explaining your definition but somehow that is ok and “rigorous”... nope.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 6 tykkäystä -
Apparently I am very intense when I ask faculty questions. I am interested in actual logical and researched answers.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @dorothyk98 ja @DrDadabhoy
Then don't ask me any questions: I'm prone to speculative digressions.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @Elysabethgrace ja @DrDadabhoy
These are the white faculty. Apparently it makes them nervous.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @dorothyk98 ja @DrDadabhoy
It also makes then very nervous when you don't play by the rules, hence my speculative digressions when a simple "I don't agree" should suffice. Actually, once had a privileged person tell me to "answer the question" that wasn't. I just don't play well.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 5 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @Elysabethgrace ja @DrDadabhoy
When I respond to hostile questions w/ researched logical answers, the white folks kind of do not know what to do. I like this digression idea. I had this whole white feminist fragility from a Byzantine historian in the spring, she really couldn’t explain anything coherently.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @dorothyk98 ja @DrDadabhoy
So true. The problem is they don't truly pick up the lesson. I discovered that after a couple of SAA confs. I don't bother w/hostile questions any more. I'll explain if I make a serious misread/mistake but I don't answer hostility any more.
#Tiring1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 3 tykkäystä -
It's a deep & varied problem, enabled by citation protocols that prioritize citing scholars in your "field" in the text & everything else in notes.. I've never forgotten seeing someone attribute "intersectionality" to V. Traub. 1/
2 vastausta 1 uudelleentwiittaus 7 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @ProfKFH, @Elysabethgrace ja
#ShakeRace scholars are in constant dialogue w.CRT, but that immersion gets whitewashed as more scholars take up race without training. And don't get me started on scholars building reps by evacuating#ShakeRace work of its politics.1 vastaus 1 uudelleentwiittaus 7 tykkäystä
The turn to work that seeks to erase the bodies that are actively being racialized and enslaved by discursive and material technologies of domination makes me wonder what is guiding their research and motives for doing race work. #ShakeRace
-
-
It was what my seminar needed at the time, but w/ the new interest in
#ShakeRace work, it feels a mistake to have started the EMRS bib with 2000. We might need an annotated bibliography of landmark works.1 vastaus 1 uudelleentwiittaus 8 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @ProfKFH, @DrDadabhoy ja
Yes: aligned issue noted (repeatedly) at our Harvard-based Women & Culture in EMWorld seminar: 1st 30+ yrs of field missing in overt citations (esp., as you say elsewhere, in diff. disciplines--& I'd add countries). Hard to do it all, but good to try where credit most due!
0 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystä
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.