Colleagues: these authors (https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/113/papers/24088/view …) suggest using the term "excluded identities" in STEM fields instead of "underrepresented minorities". I definitely agree EI is better than UR, but do you like EI better than the term "marginalized populations/groups"?
-
-
From some conversations over the last few years I think some people chafe at thinking of the institution being exclusionary, given its “success” at diversity.
-
Thank you. I think you helped me work out my feelings about the term "excluded identities"--I especially appreciated your point that "marginalized" or "minoritized" locate identity within societal structures.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
This is exactly the kind of conversation IR wrestles with—how do we responsibly report, how do we push our institutions to use the results. We know our language matters.
#irwatercooler, care to weigh in here?@msappel@MichaelDataLe@coobs I know you have thoughts -
I agree that "excluded" is not likely to be effective in communicating what is intended. I have been part of some long conversations about how to characterize this population. We ended up using URM and relating it to an NSF program/definition. 1/?
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.