Thank you for taking this on.
100% agree. This is part of why I’m running, because I’m tired of watching policy makers create laws that are antithetical to facts, science, and data. We need more people *in* Congress who have been trained in science, instead of us trying to change things from the outside.https://twitter.com/choo_ek/status/1212502932282720256 …
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I agree, mostly. Training in science is good - BUT, I’ve seen some pretty bright doctors, engineers, etc., arrive at some incredibly eye-rolling, head-shaking,stupid conclusions re matters of public policy. I believe It would be preferable to instill in kids the discipline of
-
... basing decisions on discernible facts, and not somebody’s generally accepted conclusion. Too often we apply our education as if it were a trade, rather than a discipline of thought. Still, presumably a scientist would at least have access to pertinent data.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
We also need a POTUS that understands and believes in scientific facts.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Here is an idea. Why don't scientists with their advanced education and objective thinking, learn political science and run for office. Smart politicians! Viola!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.