New: based on the past week’s evidence, we’re revising our House outlook to a Dem gain of 30-40 seats (was 25-35 last month) at @CookPolitical. This could change again before Tuesday.
-
-
There is alarming ignorance in the general population about basic statistics, and that's manipulated by some who want to seed opinions. At least that's the case here in Australia and I surmise is the case elsewhere too.
-
Ignore the polls, work to GOTV! That’s the way to win BIG. Over 300 campaigns looking for help today! https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aPO5ZeC42Jc1U70FQeqYoDsMepTnQOXyl_LHl6aRH68/htmlview#gid=0 …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Because most people don’t have PhDs, Doctor. Nuance does not generally win out, unfortunately.
-
It's not Rocket Surgery though. I don't have a PhD either, and I understand the concept of uncertainty and confidence levels.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Polls are inaccurate when disseminating more localized elections like House races. They cannot account for district realignment, multiple primary issues. Taking generic polls at face value for House races is incredibly stupid
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That’s correct, your interpretation is wrong. Per their analysis, Trump had an almost 10% chance of winning. That’s not a rare chance. That many/most people viewed it as a given that Hillary would win is not the fault of the polls or the forecasters.
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I’m cool with that.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.