Well, I do want M4A. But I want to do it in a phased in way, strengthening what we’ve already got while we make the transition.
-
-
oh, um, then how do you plan on dealing with hyde? (and all the other women’s reproductive health issues wrapped up in government control of women’s healthcare) because i cannot imagine women buying into “oh look the government is going to control your healthcare, yay”
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
All healthcare reform, even “fixing” the ACA relies on a Democratic Congress. We won’t get ANY improvements while Republicans are in control. As I’m sure you’ve seen, they want to dismantle the whole thing and replace it with high deductible plans and HSAs. 1/
1 reply 4 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @DrChristineMann @EternalNyx and
So *anything* we do, any meaningful reform, whether it’s multipayer, a public option, expanding Medicaid, all of it requires taking back Congress. All of the SP plans I have seen and support would repeal Hyde and fully cover all family planning options. My purpose in 2/
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @DrChristineMann @EternalNyx and
In having these convos it to increase support for universal coverage, with my preference being SP, among Democrats and liberal Republicans (the few that are left) so that when we take control, we have the support on OUR side to make it happen. 3/
1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DrChristineMann @EternalNyx and
Provide cover for elected officials as they vote. The Demand has to come from the ground up, not the top down. But they have to see that the demand is there for *anything* to pass. I prefer SP, and have advocated for it since 2009, based on 30 years of training and working 5/
1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DrChristineMann @EternalNyx and
Sorry, last one should have been 4/! Anyway, based on 30 years training and working in the healthcare system. I’ve contracted with Medicare, Medicaid, Champus, and every private insurer out there. I ran my practice for 11 years and did billing and collections 5/
1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DrChristineMann @EternalNyx and
Personally. So I’ve seen this up close and personal. While all options have pros and cons, I am convinced that SP has the best ratio of pros/cons. But in the end, I’ll get behind ANY system that gets all of my patients covered. I’m weary of seeing people suffer 6/
1 reply 2 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @DrChristineMann @EternalNyx and
Due to lack of care. Sorry to be so long winded. I despair for the people I see without coverage and I’m passionate about working to change that. End/
3 replies 2 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @DrChristineMann @Ange_Amene and
How would u deal with prescriptions? Medicare's coverage is awful. I had the most expensive part d plan while on medicare for a period of disability & couldnt pay 4 all my meds, 20% copay on a $700 script made it impossible to get. & what abt the donut hole?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
This is a super long discussion. I’ll try to give you highlights. There will be significant cost savings when all are covered under the same plan due to bargaining power. Acceleration of bringing generics to market. Physician and pharmacist expert boards to decide 1/
-
-
Replying to @DrChristineMann @sukatra and
coverage using evidence based data rather than insurance company executives. Reimportation of drugs if needed. Lots of nuances in here, but the crux is that physician and public led boards would look at evidence, rather than individual plans negotiating based solely on cost. End/
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.