I don't mind reading about you plan. In regards to above What is the apparatus that all of the paperwork would be going to? I want to say streamlined because from what I can tell you want everything to be paid out by one entity and this would include the paper work process.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The job losses would come from reducing administrative positions. Just as an example, in my small office, we would need 1-3 fewer people. Multiply that by 10’s of thousands of healthcare entities. Most SP advocates recognize this and have various plans to mitigate...
I’m going to do my best to answer all the questions coming my way. If I miss any, I’m sorry! I’m not trying to dodge. For me, as a doctor, healthcare policy is my number one concern in politics. Transitioning would go like this:
The losses, such as job retraining programs that would be part of the legislation.
-
-
I’m thinking this change could net fewer job losses than people expect as benefits Mgmt is still needed, pre auth, etc... and could either move to HHS or an existing private insurer would take on more m/care members and move jobs from commercial to Medicare side of biz.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So, I don’t see loss as much as shifts. I’ve worked across the healthcare spectrum and thinking some areas would lose while others would gain. IPAs for example would refocus staff on Medicare from previous commercial.
-
I agree that there is significant opportunity for shifts in jobs. Many who work in the healthcare insurance industry are nurses or other medical personnel who could be shifted to direct patient care as more people one into the system.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.