I would do it in a step-wise approach which I can tell you about if you’re interested. Let me know if you want to hear more or if you have more questions. Thanks!
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Why do you necessarily think there would be job losses? Big insurance companies administer Medicare plans across the country. Is there any reason to think that the Medicare Administration wouldn't or couldn't do the same, just with more members?
I’m going to do my best to answer all the questions coming my way. If I miss any, I’m sorry! I’m not trying to dodge. For me, as a doctor, healthcare policy is my number one concern in politics. Transitioning would go like this:
The job losses would come from reducing administrative positions. Just as an example, in my small office, we would need 1-3 fewer people. Multiply that by 10’s of thousands of healthcare entities. Most SP advocates recognize this and have various plans to mitigate...
-
-
The losses, such as job retraining programs that would be part of the legislation.
-
I’m thinking this change could net fewer job losses than people expect as benefits Mgmt is still needed, pre auth, etc... and could either move to HHS or an existing private insurer would take on more m/care members and move jobs from commercial to Medicare side of biz.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.