Hi. Please don't take this wrong way, but I read your post and all I got out of it was you want to streamline the paperwork process. You essentially want Gov't to handle all paperwork and inquiries. Are you adovcating that Gov't take over hospitals in order for this to happen?https://twitter.com/DrChristineMann/status/1025116092472193024 …
-
And every private insurance plan in my area. They all have pros/cons. I have advocated for SP since 2009, but I *celebrated* the ACA when it passed. Stayed up late on Christmas Eve watching the vote come in. The law *saved lives*. I saw what happened before it...
To my patients that had no insurance, and am eternally grateful to President Obama and Nancy Pelosi for the heroes work they did getting it through. Anyway, to answer your direct question: Good data show that “just streamlining” paperwork, ie. reducing the overhead...
-
-
Would save enough money to insure almost everyone who doesn’t have insurance now. The cost savings there is huge. But, it is a misunderstanding to suggest that the “government” would handle all that. The “government” doesn’t handle Medicare paperwork now. My staff does...
-
As a Medicare provider, I don’t work for the government. Neither does my staff. I am an independent contractor (all doctors and hospitals who contract with Medicare are) *exactly* like I am an independent contractor with Aetna, United, Blue Cross, etc...
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.